Re Kalajzich – Justice John Slattery AO, QC, “The Kalajzich Inquiry: Harnessing Technology” (1994) 6(11) Judicial Officers Bulletin 81.

“The course of the hearing was greatly accelerated”  …  “I would estimate in the vicinity of 25 to 30 per cent with proportional cost savings”

Re Estate Mortgage – The Hon. Justice Tim Smith Supreme Court of Victoria “The Estate Mortgage Court System” AIJA Technology for Justice Conference 23rd March 1998 - http://www.aija.org.au/conference98/papers/estate/index.htm

“a better "Quality of Justice", by: increasing the capacity to better examine the full range of evidence, allowing more witnesses and more exhibits, in less time, and allowing more access to the courts.” ... “the Plaintiff's solicitors estimated saving of 30% to 40% in hearing time in first eighty days ($3,000,000.00 in legal costs).”

Parliament of Victoria,  Law Reform Committee, “Technology and the Law”, May 1999.  http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/lawreform/inquiries/Technology%20and%20the%20Law/final%20report.pdf – Chapter 10.

“Those involved in the case (Estate Mortgage) have estimated that using the technology (Systematics Court) reduced court time, and therefore costs, by almost 50 per cent.”

Re Southern Equities (Bond) – Justice Bleby, “The First Electronic Trial, South Australian Supreme Court”, paper prepared at the request of the Historical Collections Librarian of the Supreme Court library for the purpose of recording some of the judge’s reactions as trial Judge to the electronic aspects of the trial, October 2002

“I came to the system (System@Law Court) with some trepidation in my technologically impaired state”…“I soon found that the system had been developed to such a high standard of user-friendliness that its use did not detract from my concentration on the trial” …“the actual trial time saved by not moving, retrieving and returning paper is at least 25%.” … “it (Systematics Court) was a pleasure to use” … “I have since returned to the comparative frustration of conventional techniques of using hard copy documents and transcript”

Re W –v- Crown NZ High Court Justice Miller – 2007 – New Zealand Law Talk July 2008

“The saving in court time saw last years first e-litigation case completed in 32.5 Days instead of the estimated 45.  Counsel and Judge (Miller J) put this saving down to the use of System@Law (Systematics Court)”.

Re CPAG Human Rights Tribunal Wellington – 2008 Royden Hindle, Chairman

Observation in transcript of proceedings that technology applied (Systematics Court) reduced hearing of evidence from 35 days to 9 days. Journal publication by Chairman anticipated shortly.